The story of Ruby if it moves towards a conclusion that is unbelievable. The process would accused the prime minister for child prostitution against an underage girl is not the first of his career. Every time our Knight was able to sneak it out of the mess, thanks to its lawyers who are able to appeal to questionable interpretations of this or that paragraph or by exploiting the time matusalemmiani process to invoke the sacred power of the prescription. Now instead evidence against him is overwhelming really how to get rid of this scandal?
Well, the gimmick brought forth from the offices of the PDL and comes with the astounding power of a tornado on the face: the lower limit of age 16 years . Yes, you read right. The genius comes from the top of mind by the name of Gaetano Pecorella, Member of the PDL, a former criminal lawyer of Berlusconi (who coincidentally), DST Emilio Fede, also investigated the case for Ruby (which even more strange coincidence). But look at it calmly ...
Berlusconi is now under investigation for a crime that involves a girl who, at the time, was a minor (he was 17 years old): This is what makes Berlusconi guilty of child prostitution. The law states that you can not induce a minor into prostitution or to perform any type of erotic sexual performance in exchange for money, favors, gifts or otherwise. These are the rules of the game . Well, the great Pecorella, taking advantage of his dignified 12 points of IQ, he thought not win the game, but just change the rules ... during the match! In fact, if this law were to pass, and if it had a retroactive effect (ie if it also applies to offenses occurring first of its entry into force), then Ruby would not be considered as a minor at the time and, like magic , the crime of child prostitution would no longer exist. The charges would fall, the offense is not. Berlusconi is not only not condemned, but it would be reprehensible. It is as if, during a football match, the captain of the losing team get up my hand and say, "Stop! Without all ... so we did not ... So take note, you FIFA: now the team that loses has right to pull 10 penalties before the end of time. " An aberrant logic, which once again confirms the cowardice of our players as people more than as politicians.
If this bill had arrived a few months late, when people have forgotten the case of Ruby, maybe we would have had the usual pattern of law ad personam applied with "discretion" . But this time the insult to the intelligence of Italians are truly overwhelming, "No, please, not even the Lodo Ruby! Lower the age of majority in full of the scandal that has engulfed the prime minister would a real slut. Sparing us this further law ad personam, last insult to the Republic "(Antonio Borghesi, Italy of Values). But Sheehan and those of its opinion, the thing looks sensatissima. It declares the lawyer for the family name well deserved, "I am of the view that today's age of majority to become too high in relation to the maturity of young people."
But beyond the ugly event in itself, since we are reflecting people, we also want to reflect a broader point of view?
We respond first to Sheehan, according to which it is right to lower the limit of age for young people today are too early and become mature much earlier than in a long time ago (of course, is an excuse not think it really makes ... studio interests ), and we say that age is defined by law, a person believed to have reached a maturity that can also carry out actions legally valid (this power is called ability to act - See Art. 2 of the Civil Code) . That is, the age is one that has reached a psychological and physical maturity such that it may exercise its rights with conscience and duties without disrupting the operation of the state machine. And, according to sociological and psychological investigations, it was considered fixed, in 1975, that limit to 18 years. Now you understand, without being sociologists or psychologists, who on average behave like young people today, as they are educated and how they are immature, even 18 years of age are not enough for them to define, or to consider them as worthy of legal capacity . For what we see around us, the boys are still plenty of immature teens! This does not only teens, but older ones: those that are so civil to come to blows on stage, those who are conscientious enough to get drunk and crashing machines when they leave nightclubs, as well educated who barely know how to read, so interested in politics who do not even know the name of the head of state, are the same guys who second Berlusconi himself were so immature and lacking critical thinking skills to be duped and fooled by the barons when university they spoke of the Gelmini reform (and now here they are already rather mature and ready for adult life) ... so only decrease the limit: the maximum you should turn it up! With us you become mature later! Perhaps Sheehan is right. He takes as a criterion sexual maturity: for him it is sufficient that the girl has given away within 16 years of age to be considered.
We respond first to Sheehan, according to which it is right to lower the limit of age for young people today are too early and become mature much earlier than in a long time ago (of course, is an excuse not think it really makes ... studio interests ), and we say that age is defined by law, a person believed to have reached a maturity that can also carry out actions legally valid (this power is called ability to act - See Art. 2 of the Civil Code) . That is, the age is one that has reached a psychological and physical maturity such that it may exercise its rights with conscience and duties without disrupting the operation of the state machine. And, according to sociological and psychological investigations, it was considered fixed, in 1975, that limit to 18 years. Now you understand, without being sociologists or psychologists, who on average behave like young people today, as they are educated and how they are immature, even 18 years of age are not enough for them to define, or to consider them as worthy of legal capacity . For what we see around us, the boys are still plenty of immature teens! This does not only teens, but older ones: those that are so civil to come to blows on stage, those who are conscientious enough to get drunk and crashing machines when they leave nightclubs, as well educated who barely know how to read, so interested in politics who do not even know the name of the head of state, are the same guys who second Berlusconi himself were so immature and lacking critical thinking skills to be duped and fooled by the barons when university they spoke of the Gelmini reform (and now here they are already rather mature and ready for adult life) ... so only decrease the limit: the maximum you should turn it up! With us you become mature later! Perhaps Sheehan is right. He takes as a criterion sexual maturity: for him it is sufficient that the girl has given away within 16 years of age to be considered.
Finally, we reflect on this other thing in your past, the Berlusconi government has repeatedly declared staunch defender of the family and has sided against prostitution. But Berlusconi has been married several times, having children by more than one wife, was also left last, Veronica Lario (and down another divorce), and now, amid scandal and scandal Noemi Ruby, apparently including children and attend for sexual purposes. If you want to elevate themselves to advocate certain moral values, he should at least give an example so if it preaches well and scratching badly, then it runs the risk of being considered a hypocrite.
It is worth recalling the words of the same when Berlusconi, Carfagna at the time of the law, so he spoke about prostitution: "Prostitution is rampant, unfortunately: girls drawn with Italy in the mirror of fashion, film, television and then forced into apartments. Real slaves! An intolerable situation! So we did this bill: higher penalties for those who exploit and for the same customers. I think these penalties are very fair, especially when the prostitutes are underage " ... but then he thought it would have created problems, and in fact today in Italy is not prostitution more crime.
It is worth recalling the words of the same when Berlusconi, Carfagna at the time of the law, so he spoke about prostitution: "Prostitution is rampant, unfortunately: girls drawn with Italy in the mirror of fashion, film, television and then forced into apartments. Real slaves! An intolerable situation! So we did this bill: higher penalties for those who exploit and for the same customers. I think these penalties are very fair, especially when the prostitutes are underage " ... but then he thought it would have created problems, and in fact today in Italy is not prostitution more crime.
0 comments:
Post a Comment