In the previous post I did a quick mention of another case of Ruby, but did not pursue the matter and not to mention what came out from the investigation. I would do it here. Recently our Prime Minister has decided to run for cover from the dust that is raised against him. Since the courts have already started their investigations and as evidence (already popular) are very strong, the Prime Minister has seen fit to spread this video on Sky TG24 that, in a study pure-white decor, with lots of background adorned with pictures of children and their families, launched his tirade against the judiciary for years that part of the unjustly prosecuted. And, while there has also spent two words (or should we talk to say do not try?) On his innocence.
Forget for a moment the absurdity whereby the defendants in our country can go on television and announce their presumed innocence, we forget how shameful it is that. Let's focus instead on the content of this short movie, we want to replicate with many jokes, because we like so much the democratic dialogue. We watch it? But yes, we admire him ...
Now, if you're not too horrified, we turn to the most salient statements and attempted to refute ...
" PM Some of the famous Milan prosecutors have made a serious intrusion into my private life "
Premier tells us that the judiciary has violated his liberty and his privacy and that, so called, indignation anyone. In reality what Berlusconi calls "interference in my private life 'is technically called judicial investigation, which we know is a procedure that is performed when there is reason to believe that someone has committed a crime, in order to find clues that crime actually occurred and, therefore, in order to punish the crime, has committed it. Fortunately, there is ample evidence and testimonies gathered by investigators for some time, which demonstrate the implementation of the two offenses in particular by Silvio Berlusconi which has been spoken in these days (and which I put two lines in the previous post): the crimes in question are child prostitution and extortion . Berlusconi says that prosecutors have no right to do these investigations because it violates his privacy, but the law not only allows the use of wiretaps and searches for purposes of investigations, but also provides that when it comes to surveys , privacy takes a back seat for obvious reasons (see Articles 13, 14 and 15 of the Constitution, just as an example). Faced with the need to investigate, that is, there is no privacy, because if not, then all the criminals could hide the evidence in the house them and say 'Hey, how dare you come into my house? It is an invasion of privacy, "and many crimes go unpunished for lack of evidence. Judicial action against this man so there is no breach, neither the law nor of privacy.
Premier tells us that the judiciary has violated his liberty and his privacy and that, so called, indignation anyone. In reality what Berlusconi calls "interference in my private life 'is technically called judicial investigation, which we know is a procedure that is performed when there is reason to believe that someone has committed a crime, in order to find clues that crime actually occurred and, therefore, in order to punish the crime, has committed it. Fortunately, there is ample evidence and testimonies gathered by investigators for some time, which demonstrate the implementation of the two offenses in particular by Silvio Berlusconi which has been spoken in these days (and which I put two lines in the previous post): the crimes in question are child prostitution and extortion . Berlusconi says that prosecutors have no right to do these investigations because it violates his privacy, but the law not only allows the use of wiretaps and searches for purposes of investigations, but also provides that when it comes to surveys , privacy takes a back seat for obvious reasons (see Articles 13, 14 and 15 of the Constitution, just as an example). Faced with the need to investigate, that is, there is no privacy, because if not, then all the criminals could hide the evidence in the house them and say 'Hey, how dare you come into my house? It is an invasion of privacy, "and many crimes go unpunished for lack of evidence. Judicial action against this man so there is no breach, neither the law nor of privacy.
"These prosecutors are not evidently liked the December 14 vote of confidence, so that after I have entered in the register of suspects'
A classic of our Prime Minister is to throw mud on the image of the judiciary, so that when he was accused of any crime may seem like a persecuted by the courts. Here, too, takes this pattern oratory, in particular, the second version of the Knight, prosecutors would have made a real vengeance, almost one out of spite, against him and with perfect timing: just after the government had had the vote of confidence, Berlusconi was under investigation. In this reality, as well as being a fake, it is also absurd, because the acts for which the investigation is under way there were many months the first vote of confidence (especially from February to May 2010, while the vote of confidence back in December). Everybody understands that it is impossible that it for revenge, because the events were caused by Berlusconi himself, and were not induced by the magistrates, that they would then be used to blame the prime minister. Berlusconi did everything himself: if he was good judges would not have been what he calls an excuse to blame. Finally, the reason why he was not immediately entered in the register of suspects is that in the months after the events, the investigators are dedicated to the collection of evidence, a task for which there is a clear time, since it can not be suspicious of someone without have a minimum of evidence against.
On balance, the only timing he used our own Prime Minister, because that's apologetic video came out, coincidentally, just after the papers were made public in the process.
"It's very serious, and it is unacceptable that, after 15 days of the start of these investigations have not sent out the same acts of the Court investigation of Ministers as absolutely required by law"
the Court of First Ministers is a section of the Court of Rome, which explicitly considers the crimes committed by ministers when they are exercising of their duties. In this case, Berlusconi refers to the second offense for which he is under investigation, to extortion, which is the first person to have put pressure on police headquarters in Milan to give the then 17 year old Ruby, in order to avoid the girl could tell the staff something on the evenings of bunga-bunga made at Arcore. On the evening of the call to the police station Berlusconi took advantage of his position as head of government to prevent the police station to inquire about the girl (who was there because she was sued for stealing). The problem is that the crime of extortion is not a crime that can carry exercising their functions, but a person must out of his office to be able to do (by definition of extortion!). But if the crime committed by the Prime Minister has made outside of his duties, and not exercising their functions, then it is no longer the responsibility of the courts of Ministers. The crime of extortion has been committed by Mr Berlusconi to cover the other offense, that of child prostitution.
the Court of First Ministers is a section of the Court of Rome, which explicitly considers the crimes committed by ministers when they are exercising of their duties. In this case, Berlusconi refers to the second offense for which he is under investigation, to extortion, which is the first person to have put pressure on police headquarters in Milan to give the then 17 year old Ruby, in order to avoid the girl could tell the staff something on the evenings of bunga-bunga made at Arcore. On the evening of the call to the police station Berlusconi took advantage of his position as head of government to prevent the police station to inquire about the girl (who was there because she was sued for stealing). The problem is that the crime of extortion is not a crime that can carry exercising their functions, but a person must out of his office to be able to do (by definition of extortion!). But if the crime committed by the Prime Minister has made outside of his duties, and not exercising their functions, then it is no longer the responsibility of the courts of Ministers. The crime of extortion has been committed by Mr Berlusconi to cover the other offense, that of child prostitution.
"It is also very serious that they tried to enter the premises of my political secretary to then search for something, saw who claim to have evidence so obvious even to ask the court immediately "
investigators, again in order to unearth clues and evidence showing the guilt of the crime, have also made the searches including those cited by Knight. Never mind that he finds it strange that you carry out searches on his person (now we understand that it is a normal thing required by law, which is necessary and that you always) and focus more on the way it is diminished the weight of the evidence . They would be so obvious to ask Berlusconi to be tried with so-called fast-track trial: the ritual is a shortened form of process expressly provided for in the Code of Criminal Procedure (art. 441). It is a process in which the defendant is always entitled to defend himself (God forbid!), But with the difference that reduces the number of investigative operations because they already have evidence of a too obvious involvement of the accused in offense that is prosecuted, that is when the fault is just blatantly obvious. Where possible, in fact, Justice to speed up their operations, as we all know how long the process can be slow and what is the Italian justice system in general because of loopholes and codicils to trap inherent in our legal codes.
But even if the summary procedure is not applicable, this would not change the substance of things, because those are the evidence, the charges also. Accusing the judiciary to propose to exaggerate the summary procedure is therefore a very weak rhetorical device: if Berlusconi prefers the entire process does nothing but prolong his agony.
But what are these tests? Berlusconi calls them "who knows what 'they are actually bribes (ie payments in forms of money) that he sent the girls who participated in the hot evenings in Arcore, their "prizes" for participating in this or that show: talk of bribes, with several thousand euro, which vary depending on the girl, and depending on performance. But not enough of these girls also received free loan of some apartments in two parks in Milan, where they lived (and where were found the bribes). Finally, the tests also fall between the intercepts of the movements of cell phones of people involved, which were reconstructed with the times and locations of the movements of the girls who participated in the feasts of Arcore.
But what are these tests? Berlusconi calls them "who knows what 'they are actually bribes (ie payments in forms of money) that he sent the girls who participated in the hot evenings in Arcore, their "prizes" for participating in this or that show: talk of bribes, with several thousand euro, which vary depending on the girl, and depending on performance. But not enough of these girls also received free loan of some apartments in two parks in Milan, where they lived (and where were found the bribes). Finally, the tests also fall between the intercepts of the movements of cell phones of people involved, which were reconstructed with the times and locations of the movements of the girls who participated in the feasts of Arcore.
"The accusations that have made against me are totally baseless and even ludicrous: the Chief of Police that was extorted from but denies ever be, and the underage person denies ever having had neither advances nor sex and claims to have presented to all as a 24 year old. "
This is the fun part, because it is the most absurd. According to Berlusconi, the mere fact that a person refuses to be involved in a crime is clear evidence of his innocence. Imagine applying this absurd logic to all other possible crimes: a thug, there is a robbery on the street, an alley runs behind, and before that a police officer stops him, hides the stolen goods. The agent asks the villain, "Where did you put the bag?". And the villain, "What bag? I have no bag. I deny ever having stolen one. " And the agent: "Oh, okay: it can go." End of story. According to this man we should take our word when we say innocent people, please, explain to him that that's not how you proves innocence.
is clear that both the Chief of Police agree that Ruby confess: if the police officer to confess, we have the case of an officer spotted the blame for not doing his job in the eyes of the whole of Italy; but if Ruby confess, his benefactor would no longer have interest in helping, send them to bestow bribes or other forms of "charity."
Finally, it is worth mentioning the following contradiction of the premier, who says he always thought that Ruby was more than eighteen at the time. Well, you know that the night that Ruby was brought to police headquarters in Milan (as reported for theft), Silvio Berlusconi telephoned from Paris and personally warned the police that the girl should be released immediately (as with dancing idiot, then "It's the grandson of Mubarak, "the President of Egypt). Order to entrust it to the regional director Nicole Minetti as her legal guardian: for the girl, who has a crush homeless several times escaped from juvenile detention centers, he needed someone who would guarantee to her, to be released. Indeed, the Minetti went personally to the police station, it is declared guardian of the girl and makes her exit. But here comes the fun part: the figure of a guardian is specifically reserved for minors, as an adult, as such, does not need it. Accepting then that the Minetti declare itself the guardian of Ruby means that Berlusconi already knew that Ruby was a minor! Sbam!
Small curiosity: who Berlusconi warned of the fact that Ruby was over at the police station? I told a Brazilian girl (also a prostitute) that Ruby had hosted in the past and had received permission from Berlusconi that they can call on his personal mobile phone (even?) In cases of urgency. And a minor crush on a girl that could be particularly dangerous and sex scandals to raise the prime minister is an urgent need for Berlusconi.
Finally, it is worth mentioning the following contradiction of the premier, who says he always thought that Ruby was more than eighteen at the time. Well, you know that the night that Ruby was brought to police headquarters in Milan (as reported for theft), Silvio Berlusconi telephoned from Paris and personally warned the police that the girl should be released immediately (as with dancing idiot, then "It's the grandson of Mubarak, "the President of Egypt). Order to entrust it to the regional director Nicole Minetti as her legal guardian: for the girl, who has a crush homeless several times escaped from juvenile detention centers, he needed someone who would guarantee to her, to be released. Indeed, the Minetti went personally to the police station, it is declared guardian of the girl and makes her exit. But here comes the fun part: the figure of a guardian is specifically reserved for minors, as an adult, as such, does not need it. Accepting then that the Minetti declare itself the guardian of Ruby means that Berlusconi already knew that Ruby was a minor! Sbam!
Small curiosity: who Berlusconi warned of the fact that Ruby was over at the police station? I told a Brazilian girl (also a prostitute) that Ruby had hosted in the past and had received permission from Berlusconi that they can call on his personal mobile phone (even?) In cases of urgency. And a minor crush on a girl that could be particularly dangerous and sex scandals to raise the prime minister is an urgent need for Berlusconi.
skipped the part, pathetic to the nth degree, the screenwriter who relates the story of an entrepreneur who, having acted alone, knows the difficulties of young people today, and then strives to help them. I refuse to comment because it goes beyond my concept of decency.
"It happens often, as we all know, that when it comes to phone tones and use different ways than the direct dialogue between people [...] and then most often in conversations private among friends, one has, maybe for fun, things never happened, or give superficial judgments for the sake of the joke "
The smell of fear is in the air here. Berlusconi knows that will be made public telephone tapping (also survey evidence) that contain his speeches about the partying, and conscious of what he admitted in those calls, it detracts from the content, always being careful not to go into details. I believe that the peak of paraculaggine is maximized in these measures.
"What the citizens of a liberal democracy are in the home only affects them,"
Technically, a crime is punishable even if made between home. Staying at home at the time of committing a crime has never been a mitigating factor, nor an excuse. Even here I imagine the scene:
"Open up, police!"
"Here I am ... What do you want?"
"We must search the apartment ... For all the gods of heaven, but this apartment is full of cocaine! "
" So what? This is my house! "
'house? It could not immediately say? Sorry for the inconvenience. Brigadier, let's go: back to the command, "
" Besides myself, since I am separated (and I never meant to say not to give media exposure), I had a stable relationship of love with someone who obviously was very often with me, even on those evenings, which certainly would not have allowed it to happen dinner or after dinner made those absurd that some newspapers have suggested "
Nooo! He ruined everything! Yes, because so far appealed to nice things, but not now! Now taking the piss is very evident! She broke the beautiful atmosphere of play and joke that we were creating together. Here we give the offense the intelligence of the listener! Do not know about you, but I do not I was more amused when she mentioned this mysterious "White Lady". Phantom as well because he would tell who he is, he has nothing to hide, but she does not want you to know: she's shy. Or who knows, maybe one day, to make the lie more believable, a fortune will be chosen to play this role, at least for the time ... Maybe fishing at random from an urn as the lottery numbers, choosing among the many Mediaset subrettine ...
Small clarification: Berlusconi did not separate. More specifically it was left by his wife, Veronica Lario, the which at the time of divorce, said: "The road is marked on my wedding: I can no longer be with a man who frequents the minors [...] I tried to help him, I pleaded with people who are near to do the same, as you would with a person who is ill. "
Let's stop here. Before you report a more valuable source of information, I like to point out some of the non-verbal cues that betray the tension of the Prime Minister at the time of shooting this video: his voice low and at times intimidated, typical of someone who knows to be guilty or of those who still feel in awe; often tends to look down to avoid the camera (who has a guilty conscience tends to prevent forms of direct contact with your partner, even at the level of gaze), numerous - and more pronounced here - errors in pronunciation, the verbal slips and gaffes that should not happen to a man accustomed to speaking in public for years and let it go several times to his speeches, but that continue to happen here, and the tic in my right shoulder ... Because they know the words to lie: no body .
In closing I would like to warn those concerned that the matter for a more complete understanding and framed of this case are much more detailed and serious sources of this little article from the blog. I would like to suggest one of many, who is also a video (so you rest from reading). Marco Travaglio a video that describes the case and the latest investigations carried out by fate, showing locations, times, characters, terms, comparing the versions of the two parties and also describes in detail the key words of the affair (Who is really Ruby? In that is the ritual of the bunga-bunga, how investigations are completed?), so as to include those who are fasting in the news. In truth I would like more to see this video rather than read this post. Have a nice day and good (real) information!
Let's stop here. Before you report a more valuable source of information, I like to point out some of the non-verbal cues that betray the tension of the Prime Minister at the time of shooting this video: his voice low and at times intimidated, typical of someone who knows to be guilty or of those who still feel in awe; often tends to look down to avoid the camera (who has a guilty conscience tends to prevent forms of direct contact with your partner, even at the level of gaze), numerous - and more pronounced here - errors in pronunciation, the verbal slips and gaffes that should not happen to a man accustomed to speaking in public for years and let it go several times to his speeches, but that continue to happen here, and the tic in my right shoulder ... Because they know the words to lie: no body .
In closing I would like to warn those concerned that the matter for a more complete understanding and framed of this case are much more detailed and serious sources of this little article from the blog. I would like to suggest one of many, who is also a video (so you rest from reading). Marco Travaglio a video that describes the case and the latest investigations carried out by fate, showing locations, times, characters, terms, comparing the versions of the two parties and also describes in detail the key words of the affair (Who is really Ruby? In that is the ritual of the bunga-bunga, how investigations are completed?), so as to include those who are fasting in the news. In truth I would like more to see this video rather than read this post. Have a nice day and good (real) information!
0 comments:
Post a Comment